Showing posts with label Twenty 20. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Twenty 20. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

A run is a run…..

By John Cheeran
Small grounds such as Rajkot make anyone a big hitter. In that sense there is little surprise that the likes of Virender Sehwag, Tillakaratne Dilshan and Kumar Sangakkara whacked around bowlers to take both India and Sri Lanka past the 400 mark.
The winner, of course, was India. But, then, you may ask, is this cricket, or a mere spectacle?
The ODI match between India and Sri Lanka had as much excitement as that of a tug-of-war contest between two rustic sides. Both sides stretched themselves to the limit of 50 overs and the tug had to be broken under the heavy load of runs. On Tuesday, that left Mahendra Singh Dhoni standing with the end of the rope.
You cannot be blamed if you were finding it difficult to tell apart whether this was a Twenty20 contest or the traditional 50 overs game. But a run is a run, wherever your pitch is.

Tuesday, October 27, 2009

Can technology lead to pure cricket?

By John Cheeran
Can technology lead to pure cricket? Free from flaws, free from erroneous decision-making?
We have appreciated technology over the years and that is true even in sport. With the ICC planning to widen the scope of technology, may be to assist umpires, may be to undermine the authority of umpires, it is interesting to tune into different views.
When Sachin Tendulkar, the most successful batsman of the recent times, says that he wants more technology but no referrals, it is a contradictory statement. Technology is the only reason why there are referrals. Without technology would there have been a rethink on the pending decision?
Even a schoolchild knows that LBWs invove the most subjective decision-making in cricket umpiring.
Tendulkar now wants only clean bowleds and LBWs out of the ambit of technology. Many, including Ian Chappell and Michael Holding, feel that HawkEye predictions are far removed from reality. So again, a cricketer has no choice but to respect the integrity and intelligence of the umpire.
Gone are the days of walking.
Now commentators talk, critics carp and still few are happy with the decision-making out on the field.
As a cricketer your aim is to win. You need to score runs and take wickets. Contemporary cricketer may be pardoned if he argues that he has no business to walk and a right to appeal on every ball.
But at the end of the day, technology can be no substitute for honesty and integrity on the part of cricketers. We need to have upright and intelligent umpires who can earn the respect of the players.
You cannot control weather. You cannot have a level playing field even in Twenty20, leave alone in Test matches sprawling over five days.
Poor decision making is part of sport, as much it is part of life. Diego Maradona's Hand of God goal did not make Argentina's World Cup triumph in 1986 illegitimate.
Yes, I know that bowlers have had a tough time to prise out batsman and the recent innovations in technology such as HawkEye, HotSpot and referrals would have tilted the scales in favour of them.
Does batsman deserve the benefit of doubt any longer?
May be, may be not.
But all a bowler has to do to dismiss the batsman is to bowl again. Over after over.
If we reduce cricket to disease diagnose, for the sake of certainty, the game will be poorer, for, what will be left of the glorious uncertainties?

Monday, October 26, 2009

Cricket is boring....REALLY?

By John Cheeran
Suddenly, people are waking up to the fact that cricket can become boring. OPEN has done a cover story which I haven't read. On Saturday, Rahul Bhattacharya makes a similar point in Mint Lounge.
Why now?
Cricket became boring a long time ago. The flood of ODIs and the likes of Zimbabwes and UAEs, washed away much of the meaning associated with the game.
May be the Champions League Twenty20 succeeded in driving home that point. Thanks, a great deal.
By the way, who won Champions League?

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Twenty20 Indian team: Is South India losing its share?

By John Cheeran
Whether India will retain Twenty20 World Cup is a question that will be answered within the next 20 days. But you don’t have to wait to read that Indian cricket is going through a significant phase.
What has happened to cricket in South of India?
The Twenty20 World Cup squad has only Pragyan Ojha from south India. You can even argue that for a change, national selectors, interestingly led by Krishnamachari Srikkanth (from Tamil Nadu), have risen above quota system and selected the best men for the job.
I do not contest that.
I cannot even recall how many south Indians were in the team that played the inaugural Twenty20 final against Pakistan. I, however, remember S Sreesanth holding on to the ball to seal India’s win.
Recently, the second edition of IPL was fought between two teams, ostensibly from south India – Deccan Chargers (Hyderabad) and Royal Challengers (Bangalore). The third team that made the cut was Chennai Super Kings.
Yes, I admit that Chennai, Bangalore and Hyderabad are pan-Indian or even international outfits. But, there should be something about the fact that these three nurseries of Indian cricket do not have more than one a player in the national squad.
In the 90s, Bangalore Boys dominated the national team. Anil Kumble, Rahul Dravid, Javagal Srinath, Venkatesh Prasad, Sujith Somasundar, Vijay Bhardwaj, David Johnson and D Ganesh were in the national reckoning.
Now Bangalore has suddenly found Manish Pandey. His time and day would come.
But Robin Uthappa is fast becoming another VB Chandrashekar.
What happened to the structure and professionalism that south Indian cricket boasted of in the past?
Despite the success of ‘south’ Indian teams in the IPL, I would like to see more talent bursting forth from the region. Let’s have an Adam Gilchrist. Let’s have another Anil Kumble.
Meanwhile, let’s root for the new-look Indian team that will defend the Twenty20 World Cup.

Wednesday, April 04, 2007

Subash Chandra's bouncer at the BCCI: Zee launches rebel league

NEW DELHI: Essel Group on Tuesday took the Cricket Board by surprise by announcing a
parallel cricket league in the country, three decades after Australian media baron Kerry Packer had done a similar thing to revolutionise the game worldwide.
The aim of the Indian Cricket League (ICL) would be to create a reserve pool of cricketers who could play for the country, Subhas Chandra, Chariman of the Essel group said.
Chandra, however, said that the league was not in "conflict" with BCCI but would instead "compliment" the Board by providing a rich talent reserve for the national team.
The league, to be held annually, would have its own contracted Indian and international players, apart from a paid selection committee. The league will start with the Twenty20 format, keeping in mind the World Cup of this new version in South Africa later this year.
Six teams will participate in this year's league which would start any time between July and August. The number of teams would be extended to 16 in the coming three years.
Each team would comprise of two national, four international and eight budding players, who would be selected by the talent scouts. The matches will be played both in the ODI and Twenty20 formats with teams playing on a home and away basis.
The league will be supported by cricketing academies across the country having state-of-the-art facilities headed by international and domestic coaches.
"The country where cricket is followed like a religion fares so poorly," Chandra said pointing at the World Cup disaster.
Chandra claimed 40 per cent of Indian viewers had lost interest in cricket after Team India's World Cup debacle and
said if corporate support to the game ceased, it would create a crisis for the game worldwide.
"After all, India pool in major chunk of the money in international cricket," he said.
Chandra was convinced that a professional league was the need of the hour.
"At present there are only 20 players contracted with the Board and there is a restriction that they cannot play for
anybody else. From each state only 25 players can come up as registered players. What about the millions of boys playing cricket in schools and colleges? Do they get a chance?" Chandra said.
"Also there are 15 states who are not members of BCCI. Like ICC has not included many country as Test playing nation and wants them to come up the world standard, similarly BCCI wants them to play and
improve their standard. We will make them members and give them opportunity," Chandra said. He said talent scouts would pick talents from across the country and groom them in academies to provide a pipeline of reserve players.
"Every country has a strong reserve benches but India don't have any," he said.
"Even if the players would be contracted to us, we are not going to stop them if they go on to play in the national team. In fact, that is our aim. If BCCI wants to draw from the talent pool, they are welcome to do so."
Chandra said the group had approached the cricket board and state associations seeking their support
for the initiative.
"We have written to BCCI and every state organisation for support. We have not received BCCI's response but I am sure they will support us."
About the composition of the teams, Chandra said, "they can be from BCCI's
contracted players, those without a contract or even former players."
Refusing to throw more light on the 12 Indian players who would feature in the league,
Chandra said, "We have roped in a few players and are talking to some others."
When specifically asked about the current players, Chandra said, "That's something I cannot comment at the moment but we are looking into everything."
He also refused to equate the league with Kerry Packer's initiative that changed world cricket.
"No, that was a coup. All the players of Australia were signed and he also chose not to get the telecast rights of the Australian Board," he reasoned.
He said that the whole venture would be a "separate entity" and Zee sports would continue to vie for telecast rights from BCCI.
"We are not shying away to tell that this is also a business proposition but at the macro level, this is a passion of the group to promote cricket. Zee Sports will continue to vie for the telecast rights from BCCI."
On the cricketing infrastructure, he said, "The academies will act as a backroom mechanism for fuelling the talent of
ICL. Special importance will be given to sports medicine and research and development initiative will be taken up," he said.
The infrastructure leasing and Finance Services Limited, is also associated with the venture and would
provide the infrastructure needed for the league.
Around Rs 100 cr would be invested in the whole set-up of the league which will have two divisions.
"It will be a corporate set-up within the Essel World. Essel Group and ILFs would make the investment." Chandra said.
"We can invite other corporate houses into it. They can create their own team and own them. Like big club football
tournaments across the world," he said.
He said they are already in the process of formulating the contract but refused to say anything on what kind of contract will be given to players.
"Players have their strength and weaknesses. No company gives the same kind of contract to all its employees," he said.
When asked whether the league will be shown on Zee Sports, Chandra said, "We can have Zee Sports as the partner or we can decide to sell them.
ജാലകം
 
John Cheeran at Blogged